Saturday, May 25, 2013

Aquarius, Saturn and Uranus

Historically, Aquarius was ruled by Saturn. After the discovery of Uranus, some astrologers deemed that Aquarius should more correctly be ruled by that planet. Still the Saturnine side of Aquarius cannot blithely be discarded. If we were to reference the chapter on Uranus that Bil Tierney contributed to Planets, The Astrological Tools, we will note that Bil wants to make it clear that Uranian energy and Aquarian energy are not the same thing, even though they both fall under the same classification of “Letter 11” in Zipporah Dobyns' 12-letter alphabet of astrology.

My mentor, Press Roberts, LPN, felt that the first half of Aquarius was more Uranian, but the second half was more Saturnine. He felt the opposite for Scorpio and Pisces, in which the first half of those signs retained the historical rulership, but the second half responded to the modern rulership.

There are some areas where the influences of Saturn and Uranus may be confused, but creative thought processes may clarify matters. For instance, business, business administration and business acumen are rightfully ruled by Capricorn and Saturn. But really big business is ruled by Aquarius and Uranus. Remember that Noel Tyl says that in any confrontation between Saturn and Uranus, Uranus always wins.

Hair, at least in the structural and functional sense, is ruled by Saturn. Hair styling, hair design and the artistic component of hair is ruled by Venus. Barbering, i.e. hair cutting, is ruled by Mars. Yet a little-known fact is that body hair is ruled by Uranus. Believe it or not, I find that women who don't shave their underarms to be erotic. I can explain this attitude astrologically. I have Uranus in the seventh house. The seventh house shows the traits one finds attractive in a partner. Along with the breasts and brain, Cancer rules the lymphatic system and the armpits. So Uranus in the seventh house in Cancer explains my attraction.

Uranus rules the unexpected and the contradictory. An easily understood example is that Uranus also rules both the very new and the very old. Astrology offers techniques that are very old, very new and sometimes a combination of both. Uranus, as a ruler of astrology, makes sense here, but Uranus is not the only ruler of astrology. Other planets, such as Mercury, can contribute to the knowledge of astrology.

Conventional wisdom says that Uranus rules the unstable. But sometimes Uranus in a house can show situations that are unexpectedly stable. For example, both of my parents had Uranus in the fourth house. They were both born thousands of miles away from where we lived. They bought a home in 1949. That house stayed in the family, even after both of them were deceased. It wasn't until 2011, some 62 years later, that the house was sold the settle my parents' estates.

Similarly, I have Uranus in the seventh house. My wife and I were together for 26½ years. The marriage ended with her passing away in 2001. We did fight like cats and dogs, but we never got divorced.

Don Borkowski
Woodburn, Oregon

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Solar Arcs: The Next Generation of Progressions

This blog post is a recap of a lecture I gave to the Oregon Astrological Association a few years ago.
Solar Arcs is a predictive technique that is a refinement of the more traditional secondary progressions. In many ways, solar arcs are easier to read, easier to estimate and more reliable than progressions.  I have studied astrology since 1971. I have been aware of solar arcs since 1990, but have only used them exclusively since 2001.
  • Don’t let the simplicity of Solar Arcs make you take them lightly.
  • Many of the details of progressions do not matter with solar arcs.
  • Start with your progressed Sun. Then move everything the same distance that your Sun has progressed.
  • Solar arcs will always have the same relationship to each other that the natal chart has.
  • Just notice the aspects between the arced planets and the natal planets.
  • A solar arc doesn’t depend on a natal aspect in order to manifest.
  • Only hard-angle aspects—conjunctions, oppositions and squares—matter. Use an “equals sign” (=) to show these. Hard-angle minor aspects—the semi-square and sesqui-square—are also valid. The 165o aspect (quindecile) is also valid, but that’s an advanced topic. Soft-angle aspects and minor aspects are not important.
  • Planets gain meaning from both their intrinsic nature and from house rulership.
  • You can estimate solar arcs from the natal chart. You don’t need a computer or an ephemeris. Allow a degree per year of age for births from September through March; else reduce your estimate a degree for every 30 years.
  • The orbs used in solar arcs might feel a little soft or sloppy if you have a lot of Virgo in your makeup.
  • Changes of signs are not important.
  • Arcs to the Aries Point (0o of the cardinal signs) invoke the prominence of that planet.
  • Between age 45 and 47, every planet will arc to a semi-square to its own place.
  • Arcs to midpoints (indirect arcs) have a lesser importance. They add flavoring.
  • The locality of the arced chart is not important.
  • Solar arcs work for single charts only; they are not applicable to synastry.
  • You don’t have to give up progressions, even if you choose to concentrate on solar arcs.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Making Solar Returns Sing and Dance

I can make solar return charts sing and dance. If you try my process, you can also. I do want to make it known that I was never trained to do anything with solar return charts. My first astrology teacher, Press Roberts LPN,, felt that all prediction could be garnered through a combination of progressions and transits. He dismissed solar returns as being a waste of time, as they were just transits anyway. My current teacher, Noel Tyl, doesn’t like solar returns because he had some unfortunate experiences that resulted from too much stock being placed on a solar return that was predicated on an erroneous assumption. He is also uncomfortable about some previously unaddressed issues of solar return calculations.

Timing is perhaps the biggest shortcoming of solar return charts. Basically, they seem to represent a summary of the year taken as a whole. In the experience of people in my circle, the most significant time is three (3) months after the solar return. In fact, a couple years ago, my son asked me why everything seems to happen in November—for both him and me. Significantly, both my son and I have August birthdays.

When Noel Tyl invited Mary K. Shea to write an essay on solar returns, Mary claimed that solar returns manifest 3 months before they happen. Although I have seen it happen to a much smaller degree, those events that happen three months beforehand are generally the more benign manifestations of the solar return. My observation, that solar returns are felt most strongly 3 months after they happen, corresponds best with the “opening square” in Grant Lewi’s transit theory, as those are the most traumatic manifestations.

Much of what I believe about solar returns has been derived from my own experimentation. First, of course they really are just transits. But the solar return chart does provide a lens through which we can focus our look at those transits. They give us a guideline to help us narrow the scope of the operative progressions, arcs and transits. Second, there is a question about which zodiac to use. The zodiac that you choose for natal astrology should be the one to use for solar returns. I am firmly committed to the tropical zodiac. Some tropical astrologers want to use something called the precession-corrected tropical zodiac. To me, the word “correction” implies that there is an error. I prefer to call that method “precession-adjusted”, but, nevertheless, I do not use it. Likewise, the precession-adjusted zodiac is really just apologia by the closet astronomers whose belief in astrology is more tenuous than they care to admit. If a person believes in sidereal astrology, s/he should stick with it all the way. So, I recommend the tropical zodiac in solar returns, just as I recommend it in natal astrology.

The major previously unaddressed issue about solar returns is the choice of location where to cast the chart. There are two strongly held beliefs. One prefers to use the current location. The other favors the birthplace. I submit that both definitions may be correct at times. I have also found a third alternative which works best for me. I view the solar return chart as being very dynamic, so dynamic, that if the client moves during the course of the year, the previous solar return chart must be recalculated for the new location.

Consider, if you will, my own horoscope. I was born August 15, 1950 at 4:24 p.m. PDT in the Forest Park neighborhood of Portland, Oregon. I have Aries on the 4th cusp, and the ruler Mars is in the 10th house at 3:12 Scorpio. Every major move I have ever made was made for the reason of career advancement, usually within a financial industry.

In 2003, I was living in Salem, Oregon. In early 2004, I was offered a job at a bank in Nampa, Idaho. I had not been to any part of Idaho since 1974, when I passed through on an interstate bus. I moved to Nampa March 11, 2004. My 2003 solar return for Salem, Oregon had 27:54 Libra rising. Just for fun, I wondered what my re-cast solar return for Nampa would show. Amazingly, the re-cast chart had 3:15 Scorpio rising—just a scant 3 minutes from my natal Mars. And I had moved to Nampa to work in a bank!

This observation explained a lot for me. Regardless of where you were living when your solar return came around, you will need to recalculate your solar return to your new location when you move.

As long as we are talking about calculations, now is the time to mention to be sure to calculate your favorite Arabic parts at this time, too. I will discuss them later.

Now that you have calculated the solar return chart, the next (and most obvious) problem is how to read it.

I have seen and heard several theories about how to read return charts, and I feel they should all be kept in mind, but only in the back of your mind.

First and foremost, it must be remembered that a solar return chart represents the summary of a year. Second, it must also be remembered that nothing can really happen in a yearly preview, unless the natal chart says that it can happen. Third, as return charts are defined when a transit makes a precise conjunction to its own place in the natal chart, conjunctions, and to a lesser extent, oppositions, between the return chart and the natal chart provide the major clues about how to read the solar return chart.

Go back, if you will, to my natal horoscope. Then calculate my solar return for August 15, 2001, also for Forest Park. I was working in Portland’s Forest Park neighborhood and dividing my off time between my home in Salem, Oregon and my mother’s home in Portland’s Kenton neighborhood. As Salem is 50 miles south of Portland, the differences among the solar returns for any of these locations are negligible.

Two items caught my eye immediately. First was the tight opposition between the Sun and Uranus, with only 20 minutes of orb. The Sun was both in and ruling the 4th house, and Uranus was both in and ruling the 10th house. This combination suggested that age 51 would bring changes and issues involving home, career and status. I was also intrigued by the other massive opposition—that between Saturn in the first house, ruling the 8th and the Mars-Pluto conjunction in the 7th, sharing rulership of the 6th with Mars ruling the 12th. (The notion that Pluto is the true ruler of Aries was rather popular in the early 1970s. I believe that concept is one whose time has passed.)

It has been my personal preference to take a look at my solar returns about 6 months before they happen. If they, as Mary Shea thinks, do register 3 months before they happen, then I’ll have some time for preparation. Otherwise, the long lead time will give my subconscious mind some food for thought. As my marriage had been barely tolerable for several years, I kept wondering if I would have the fortitude to terminate it. The horary astrology technique of counting houses, which is just as valid in natal astrology, gives us the definition that the 10th house represents the end of the marriage. So the “big bells” in this solar return chart all suggested that my marriage would come to a screeching halt. Other indications of marital issues in the solar return chart include Jupiter, ruling my natal ascendant conjunct my natal Uranus in the 7th and Mercury, ruling my natal 7th, opposing my natal Jupiter.

There are really only two ways for a marriage to end: divorce and death. Then there are subsidiary considerations within those. Who would leave whom, or who would die? On the surface, I could not rightly tell. I decided to examine the appropriate Arabic Parts, which I often find to be a useful tool. Apparently, some astrologers have never considered the idea of adding Arabic Parts to a return chart. Go ahead, you have my permission. (Parenthetically, I believe that the most common definition of the Part of Divorce is wrong. Some people believe that if the Part of Marriage equals ascendant + descendant – Venus, then the Part of Divorce should reverse the order of the descendant and Venus. That opinion is weak because such a point will always be opposite to one’s Venus. Cosmobiological theory equates conjunctions, oppositions and squares; so that formula for the Part of Divorce will add nothing to a horoscope. For the Part of Divorce, I favor ascendant + descendant – Saturn, as Saturn is the natural ruler of the 10th house.) The Part of Death is almost universally agreed to be ascendant + 8th house cusp – Moon. There is an alternative Part of Death, which I really can’t say much about. It is Saturn + Mars – MC.

I calculated those Arabic Parts. The Part of Divorce was 4:18 Sagittarius, conjunct the descendant from the 6th house with an orb of 4½ degrees. The Part of Death was 9:38 Sagittarius, conjunct the descendant from the 7th house with an orb of 48 minutes. (That other Part of Death was 22:21 Aries. That one is just within the 12th house, trine to the Sun and sextile Uranus. It also suggested a death, but did not suggest whose.) I remember saying, “Oh my God, I wonder if Georgie is going to die.” I banished the thoughts because I didn’t have the self-confidence in my skills and because my teachers felt so lukewarm about solar returns. On November 12, 2001, my wife, Georgie, had a fatal heart attack. I hated being right in that manner, but the points are that I was right, the solar return worked, and it manifested 3 months after my birthday.

I don’t purport to know everything about solar returns. There is a huge amount of room for learning new things about them. I just want to encourage all who read this blog to keep observing and experimenting with return charts and not to be cowed or browbeaten by the pseudo-intellectuals and self-anointed experts.

Don Borkowski
Woodburn, Oregon
(503) 843-9277

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Lois Rodden and Houses

Lois Rodden was a friend of mine (pen-pal variety, as we never met in person). She used Placidus houses for years and years until she knuckled under to the pressure by her local students in the Los Angeles-San Bernardino area of Southern California and switched to Koch. I could live with that because I could reverse-engineer the charts she supplied to create Placidus houses. Then the late Jayj Jacobs talked her into using equal houses, which was not acceptible to me. Many British users of equal houses add the MC as a point in a chart, but Jayj, following the lead of his father, Moby Dick, was in total disdain of the MC. An equal house chart, without a Midheaven, is very, very difficult to reverse-engineer.

It was later demonstrated that Lois' 6th and final bout with cancer left her so full of medication that some of her later decisions were rather questionably too Neptunian.

Lois was born in Lang, Saskatchewan, Canada. In March, 2008, I took a weekend trip to Regina while I was living and working in North Dakota. I drove through Lang on both the trip up and the trip back.

Don Borkowski
(503) 843-9277

Don Borkowski

(503) 843-9277

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Pen names, etc.

I got a computerized horoscope back in 1970, roughly a year before I decided to learn astrology for myself. It said that Neptune conjunct the MC would incline me to take a pen name. I never have, but I needed something on Tylnet to distinguish myself from Don McBroom. I got so hurt when people would say how smart and wonderful Don is, and then realize that they didn't mean me.

A co-worker started addressing me as "Donbee" after I would sign forwarded jokes as "Don B." So to Tyl students, I am Donbee, and Don McBroom now uses Don Mc. Oddly, neither of us is named "Donald".

My late wife's birth name was Loreta Gene McLearen. Loreta is pronounced with a long E. So my wife was "Reta Gene" to her family and "Lori" to her friends. In the late 1960s, she actually knew the Beatles and had an affair with George Harrison behind Patti Boyd's back. So she later changed her name, legally, to Georgeanne Harrison. Then she married me and took Borkowski as a surname. And much, much later changed her name back to Lori McClearen.

I should add that during the time she knew the Beatles, she told Paul McCartney that in America, “traffic wardens” were called "meter maids". Paul thought that was so funny, that he teasingly called her "Reta Gene the Meter Maid" and from that hook, a song was born.

Names seem to be a function of both the first and third houses, with each contributing different attributes of names.

Don Borkowski
(503) THE-WASP [843-9277]

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The Conscientious Astrology Writer

Perhaps the biggest challenge for a conscientious astrological writer is to communicate which arrangements of planets, houses, signs and aspects are meaningful to humanity as a whole and which are germane only to an individual.

Let me give a specific example. About 1970, Isabel Hickey wrote unequivocally in Astrology: A Cosmic Science, that if a man has Moon conjunct Saturn and the majority of his planets are in feminine signs, then he must be homosexual. I had no idea where the heck she got that. But the damage was done. One of my best friends at the time had that signature. He was so distaught, that he gave up the study of astrology. Although, I long had the sophistication not to believe everything that I read in books, my friend was not so lucky, You see, I, too have that signature­-- as does my son. And all three of us are exclusively hetero.
I was not a fan of Mrs. Hickey's for this and other reasons. When my wife and I attended an astrology convention in 1983, we met a nice man who thought the world of Isabel Hickey. A quick look at his chart showed that he had the Moon conjunct Saturn and the majority of his planets in feminine signs. Before I got the chance to ask him how he felt being labeled as homosexual, it dawned on me that not only was he gay, but that his chart most likely was the template that Isabel Hickey had used. Putting two and two together, I concluded that Mrs. Hickey probably invented that rule on the spot just to make that man feel better about himself. So I'm sure that that signature worked for him, but not necessarily for anyone else.
So the astrological writer must be extremely careful not to allow an ad hoc signature to morph into something bigger.

I ran into a similar situation when I was giving a lecture. I frequently have the problem in which someone will take one of my off-hand remarks and try to make a federal case out of it. When I rectify a chart, I tend to single out what makes a person special, uncommon, or even unique. I like to take a solar chart and rotate it so that the most plausible combination of planets and houses is displayed. Then by using solar arcs, transits and progression, I'll adjust that chart to fit the timing of known events.
My paternal grandparents were both born in Ukraine. They were married 58-1/2 years from 1896 until my grandfather died in 1955. They had 7 children and outlived 4 of them. That is a rather uncommon fact. In dealing with my grandparents' charts, I developed an ad hoc signature for them. Both of my gransparents had charts that contained a group of four planets that were close enough to be put in the same house. That house would be the 12th because it is the 8th from the 5th. This is when people would confront me. I had to make things clear that if you have any planet in the 12th house, it does not mean that your child would die. However, if, God forbid, you were to outlive a child, then the astrological reasons would be known.

After I developed plausible charts for my grandparents, I corrected the birthtime based on known events, such as their emigration to the United States in November, 1913.

Don Borkowski
October 9, 2012, 8:13 p.m.
Sheridan, Oregon

Monday, October 1, 2012

Sex, Sex, Sex

Before any serious discussion of sex can take place, it must first be established what component of sex is being addressed.

I date my involvement with astrology since June 7, 1971. My first teacher/mentor, Press Roberts, LPN, had such a profound influence on me that most of my astrological beliefs/philosophies were established upon what I learned from him. A couple weeks after meeting him, Press asked me which house I thought sex came from. I replied sheepishly, “The... uh ...5th?”
Press then answered most dramatically, “Don't shit yourself, boy. It's the 8th. I've never forgotten that. Many years later, I enrolled in Noel Tyl's Master's class. And I have felt conflicted since then as Noel feels just as emphatically that sex comes from the 5th house as sex is how children are made and because sex is, or should be, connected to love.
Cutting to the chase, I feel that the emotional component of sex would definitely be the 5th house, but that the physical component of sex would come from the 8th house. Examples abound. Back in 1992 when Bill Clinton first became part of the national conciousness, and long before anyone had heard of Paula Jones or Monica Lewinsky, I took a look at his chart. Bill Clinton has the Moon in Taurus in the 8th house. So I told my wife that this guy loves oral sex with women. When she said that I had a dirty mind, I replied that it was all in the keywords. The 8th house is physical sex. The Moon is women. And Taurus rules the mouth. What a strightforward example of how keyword astrology can work!
Even Noel, himself, has written that he has taken Viagra© on occasion. His (convoluted) explanation was that he has Neptune (of weakness) in the 4th house, which is the 12th dynamic of the 5th house. I would have said that his 8th house was ruled by Saturn,which is in opposition to Neptune. This introduces Neptune into his sexual profile more quickly and directly.
By definition, the 5th house and the 8th house will always be square to each other in the mundane sense. When studying the philosophical meanings of houses and their interrelationship, it is best to think of houses in an equal house system. Then it becomes blatantly obvious that it would take the transiting Sun 9 months to travel from the 8th house to the 5th house. As 9 months is the typical duration of a pregnancy from intercourse to birth, the assignment of the 8th house to sex becomes much easier to accept.
Recently a top local psychic gave me the good advice to stop comparing myself to other people. For the longest time, I was embarassed that I was the oldest of my peers to lose his virginity. I'm bringing this out in the open in accordance with my psychic's advice. Actually, I had 3-1/2 years of astrological experience when it happened, which meant that I made it a point to look at the clock. As I wrote earlier, I had felt conflicted about which astrological house truly represented sex. In my horoscope, Venus rules the 5th house, but is tenanted in the 8th. Studying my own chart wouldn't settle any questions. In fact, when I first had sex, February 21, 1975 at 10:10 pm PST in Sellwood, Oregon, the midheaven was exactly conjunct my natal Venus!

Don Borkowski
October 1, 2012, 3:17 pm
Sheridan, Oregon